Home

megújító Bizalom következtetés brembs nature science Részleges csillagmagasságmérő kitaláció

PDF] Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Semantic Scholar
PDF] Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Semantic Scholar

Michael Eisen on Twitter: "@brembs @eLife Agree that it's a drop in the  bucket, but, as chemists well know, sometimes a drop in the bucket is a  catalyst." / Twitter
Michael Eisen on Twitter: "@brembs @eLife Agree that it's a drop in the bucket, but, as chemists well know, sometimes a drop in the bucket is a catalyst." / Twitter

High APCs Are a Feature, Not a Bug – The Wire Science
High APCs Are a Feature, Not a Bug – The Wire Science

bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?

PDF) Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
PDF) Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability

Björn Brembs 🇺🇦💙💛 on Twitter: "Yes, I have been critical of some of  @mbeisen 's plans with @elife, but nobody, let alone someone as competent  and experienced as Mike should have to
Björn Brembs 🇺🇦💙💛 on Twitter: "Yes, I have been critical of some of @mbeisen 's plans with @elife, but nobody, let alone someone as competent and experienced as Mike should have to

Reproducibility: expect less of the scientific paper
Reproducibility: expect less of the scientific paper

PDF) Towards a Scientific Concept of Free Will as a Biological Trait:  Spontaneous Actions and Decision-Making in Invertebrates
PDF) Towards a Scientific Concept of Free Will as a Biological Trait: Spontaneous Actions and Decision-Making in Invertebrates

Volume 614 Issue 7949, 23 February 2023
Volume 614 Issue 7949, 23 February 2023

The neurobiological nature of free will
The neurobiological nature of free will

PDF) How Nature Magazine consistently prefers anecdote over data
PDF) How Nature Magazine consistently prefers anecdote over data

bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?

bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?

bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?

A replication crisis in the making: how we reward unreliable science
A replication crisis in the making: how we reward unreliable science

bjoern.brembs.blog » Earning credibility in post-factual science?
bjoern.brembs.blog » Earning credibility in post-factual science?

bjoern.brembs.blog » No need to only send your best work to Science Magazine
bjoern.brembs.blog » No need to only send your best work to Science Magazine

Björn Brembs 🇺🇦💙💛 on Twitter: "@json_dirs Yes, and it's not just  Elsevier that aim to spy on the entire scientific workflow:  https://t.co/LOcY3Dx9Iw https://t.co/L3KkdZvYKc" / Twitter
Björn Brembs 🇺🇦💙💛 on Twitter: "@json_dirs Yes, and it's not just Elsevier that aim to spy on the entire scientific workflow: https://t.co/LOcY3Dx9Iw https://t.co/L3KkdZvYKc" / Twitter

Can Science Set Us Free? - John Templeton Foundation
Can Science Set Us Free? - John Templeton Foundation

bjoern.brembs.blog » How scientific are scientists, really?
bjoern.brembs.blog » How scientific are scientists, really?

OSR098 Academic Publishing Infrastructures with Björn Brembs [EN] – Open  Science Radio
OSR098 Academic Publishing Infrastructures with Björn Brembs [EN] – Open Science Radio

PDF] Can scientists and their institutions become their own open access  publishers? | Semantic Scholar
PDF] Can scientists and their institutions become their own open access publishers? | Semantic Scholar

Science Online?
Science Online?

File:Poster "Hands-on open science- Bridging scientific knowledge gaps in  Wikimedia projects".pdf - Wikimedia Commons
File:Poster "Hands-on open science- Bridging scientific knowledge gaps in Wikimedia projects".pdf - Wikimedia Commons